 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
David Dwork
Barron & Stadfeld, PC
100 Cambridge Street
Suite 1310
Boston, Massachusetts 02114
(617) 723-9800
dpd@barronstad.com |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Type of action:
Medical Malpractice
Injuries alleged:
Catastrophic, perinatally-acquired injuries including
severe cerebral palsy, seizure disorder, hypoxic ischemic
encephalopathy, feeding difficulty requiring both
a gastrostomy tube and a jejunostomy tube, central
nervous system dysfunction, respiratory difficulties
and partial blindness.
Amount of settlement:
Settled with cash component and structured settlement
component with a combined cost in excess of four million
dollars ($4,000,000.00) with total payouts, based
on normal life expectancies, of nearly twenty-seven
million dollars ($27,000,000.00).
Other useful information:
This case involved claims of medical malpractice against
seven physicians, including three obstetricians, two
gastroenterologists, one hematologist and one internist,
as well as a medical group practice, for their failure
to diagnose and properly treat a paraesophageal hernia
in an adult female over a period of several years.
In 1992, the plaintiff was thirty-one weeks pregnant
with her infant daughter when the hernia ruptured,
necessitating emergency surgery and Cesarean section
delivery of the child by doctors other than the defendants.
The child showed signs of significant perinatal hypoxia,
severe acidosis and profound, permanent neurological
injury. The case was significant for several reasons
including the fact that much of the alleged negligent
treatment occurred over an eight-year period prior
to the conception of the child. The plaintiffs contended
that despite having expertise in several medical specialties,
each of the defendants failed on the most basic of
levels as physicians to take proper and complete medical
histories and to review and appreciate the significance
of medical records, including a chest x-ray taken
in 1989 which was strongly suggestive, if not diagnostic,
of the patient's condition. The plaintiffs obtained
opinion letters of some nineteen physician experts
whom they intended to call at trial. In addition to
claims for the child's injuries, the plaintiff mother
brought claims for her own personal injury and emotional
distress, as well as for the loss of the child's consortium.
The plaintiff father brought claims for emotional
distress and loss of the child's consortium. At the
time of settlement, the child was nearly six years
old, resided at home, attended a school for the severely
handicapped on a daily basis and received home care
from her family and occasional home nursing services.
The defendants contested several issues in the case,
including life expectancy, for which they cited several
well-published studies on the compromised longevity
of severely handicapped children. According to these
studies and due to the child's extreme disabilities,
including an inability to sit upright without assistance,
it was the defendants' position that she could not
reasonably be expected to live beyond five years.
It was the opinion of the child's treating pediatric
physiatrist that she could reasonably expect to live
at least until her fifties, in large part due to the
excellent care that she received from her family and
other providers, her relatively stable health, and
due to recent advances in rehabilitative care. The
defendants also contested liability on several points,
including whether any of them could be liable for
injuries ultimately sustained by the child based on
alleged negligence prior to conception. They also
vigorously maintained that none of them acted in any
way which caused or contributed to the plaintiffs'
injuries, and intended to call several well-credentialed
physician experts to testify to these opinions and
to the mother's own alleged refusal to permit treatment
and/or failure to seek follow up care which they claimed
would have resulted in appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Once the claims against the defendants were resolved,
plaintiffs' counsel were successful in convincing
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to substantially
reduce its lien for Mass. Health benefits paid by
a proportionate share of the plaintiffs' procurement
costs, including attorney's fees and expenses.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
‹‹
BacK |
|
| |
|
|
|